![]()
BRS6-1-2 - Glycaemic Variability Regulation
1. Mission & Overview
Mission
Limit glycaemic volatility so post-prandial glucose swings do not create unnecessary metabolic and neuroendocrine stress.
Intervention Dominance: Diet-Dominant — Lifestyle Levers
Tested protocols in the stated study populations, not general prescriptions.
- Supervised interval walking (two-week trial)
- Four brief vigorous activity bouts daily (48-hour trial)
Medication, hypoglycaemia risk, exercise capacity and eating-window suitability require individual assessment.
Overview
Blood glucose varies as meals arrive and tissues take up their fuel. Regulation concerns the size, duration and frequency of these changes, rather than keeping glucose perfectly flat. In a small uncontrolled type 2 diabetes cohort, short aerobic training was associated with selected excursion changes. The order of a meal also changed within-meal variability. These findings identify activity and meal protocols that can influence different parts of the glucose pattern. Monnier et al. (2006) [1]; Mikus et al. (2012) [2]; Kuwata et al. (2016) [5]; Dunstan et al. (2012) [6]
- Benefits: Selected protocols changed measured glucose-dispersion endpoints in the studied diabetes cohorts; this does not establish a clinical or cognitive benefit. Mikus et al. (2012) [2]
- Implementation Notes: Aerobic activity was assessed over seven days; this is not evidence that every ordinary fluctuation needs correcting. Monnier et al. (2006) [1]; Mikus et al. (2012) [2]; Kuwata et al. (2016) [5]; Dunstan et al. (2012) [6]
- Biological Relevance: A smaller average glucose response does not necessarily demonstrate lower variability.
2. Primary Biological Effects
- Short aerobic training was associated with selected excursion changes in an uncontrolled diabetes cohort; high-excursion frequency and duration remained inconclusive. Mikus et al. (2012) [2]
- Fish before rice reduced within-meal glucose variability in the diabetes group. Kuwata et al. (2016) [5]
- An observational diabetes study linked glucose fluctuation measures with urinary oxidative-stress markers. Monnier et al. (2006) [1]
- Brief walking interruptions reduced postprandial glucose and insulin exposure versus continuous sitting. Dunstan et al. (2012) [6]
3. Intervention Levers
No independently admitted Direct/Derived Dietary Requirements established by this assessment.
No additional separately adjudicated biochemical requirement established by this assessment; generic metabolic participation is not an admitted PM-specific requirement.
No mapping established.
Tested protocols in the stated study populations, not general prescriptions.
- Less-processed whole-grain food package (two-week trial)
- Early eating with front-loaded calories (six-day trial)
Medication, hypoglycaemia risk, exercise capacity and eating-window suitability require individual assessment.
4. Mechanistic Basis + Scientific Findings (SFs 8)
Summary
In an uncontrolled cohort of 13 sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes, seven days of aerobic training were associated with lower glucose range and selected excursion measures; high-glucose excursion frequency and duration remained statistically inconclusive. Mikus et al. (2012) [2]
SF1 — Short training and observed glucose excursions
In an uncontrolled cohort of 13 sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes, seven days of aerobic training were associated with lower glucose range and selected excursion measures; high-glucose excursion frequency and duration remained statistically inconclusive. Mikus et al. (2012) [2]
Supporting evidence: SF1 — Short training and observed glucose excursions.
SF2 — A meal protocol affects acute glucose variability
Fish before rice reduced within-meal glucose variability in the diabetes group. Kuwata et al. (2016) [5]
Supporting evidence: SF2 — A meal protocol affects acute glucose variability.
SF3 — Variability and oxidative stress are associated
An observational diabetes study linked glucose fluctuation measures with urinary oxidative-stress markers. The original cohort association was not reproduced in an independent better-controlled diabetes sample using mass spectrometry. Population and assay differences constrain generalisation; this is not a causal oxidative-stress claim. Monnier et al. (2006) [1]
Supporting evidence: SF3 — Variability and oxidative stress are associated.
SF4 — Sitting breaks lower a meal response without proving a volatility endpoint
Brief walking interruptions reduced postprandial glucose and insulin exposure versus continuous sitting. This supports activity-related meal responsiveness; AUC alone does not measure volatility. Dunstan et al. (2012) [6]
Supporting evidence: SF4 — Sitting breaks lower a meal response without proving a volatility endpoint.
SF5 — Whole-grain processing and daily variability
In adults with type 2 diabetes, the tested less-processed whole-grain package reduced daily glucose standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) versus a nutrient-matched finely processed package over two weeks. Aberg et al. (2020) [7]
Supporting evidence: SF5 — Whole-grain processing and daily variability.
SF6 — Early eating and glucose variability
In a small prediabetes crossover, the tested early, front-loaded eating schedule reduced mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) over six days versus later calorie distribution; mean glucose and several other variability/range measures were inconclusive. Bruno et al. (2024) [8]
Supporting evidence: SF6 — Early eating and glucose variability.
SF7 — Interval walking and glucose variability
Two weeks of the tested supervised interval-walking programme reduced mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) versus an inactive control period in a small type 2 diabetes crossover trial. Karstoft et al. (2017) [10]
Supporting evidence: SF7 — Interval walking and glucose variability.
SF8 — Vigorous activity bouts and variability
Four brief vigorous bodyweight bouts daily produced small secondary continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) variability improvements over 48 hours in inactive adults with well-controlled type 2 diabetes; the primary mean-glucose contrast was not significant. Babir et al. (2026) [11]
Supporting evidence: SF8 — Vigorous activity bouts and variability.
Biological process
Continuous monitoring tests variability more directly than one fasting value. Mikus et al. (2012) [2]
Mechanism Boundary
A smaller average glucose response does not necessarily demonstrate lower variability. This assessment preserves each source’s measured endpoint; the Mission describes the biological job and does not assert that every tested lever achieved the entire Mission.
Integration
This PM contributes its specified process to BRS6(FM1). Shared fuels, nutrient lists and correlated markers do not merge distinct biological jobs or establish the integrated outcome.
4.1 Scientific Findings (8)
Summary
CGM exercise results and acute meal-sequence variability are responsive endpoints. The oxidative-stress paper is observational, not experimental proof that fluctuations cause more injury than steady hyperglycaemia. Monnier et al. (2006) [1]; Mikus et al. (2012) [2]; Kuwata et al. (2016) [5]; Dunstan et al. (2012) [6]
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
In an uncontrolled cohort of 13 sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes, seven days of aerobic training were associated with lower glucose range and selected excursion measures; high-glucose excursion frequency and duration remained statistically inconclusive.
What this means
Continuous monitoring tests variability more directly than one fasting value.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F1
Finding Statement: In an uncontrolled cohort of 13 sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes, seven days of aerobic training were associated with lower glucose range and selected excursion measures; high-glucose excursion frequency and duration remained statistically inconclusive.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: In an uncontrolled cohort of 13 sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes, seven days of aerobic training were associated with lower glucose range and selected excursion measures; high-glucose excursion frequency and duration remained statistically inconclusive.
Synthesis Limitations: Uncontrolled before/after association, not demonstrated exercise causation or all-endpoint improvement. No cognitive or ADHD endpoint; a null 24-hour mean does not negate endpoint-specific excursion changes.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Thirteen sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes; habitual-activity days compared with seven-day training.
- Population
- Thirteen sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes; habitual-activity days compared with seven-day training.
- Result
- CGM excursions decreased without measurable fitness or body-composition change.
- Effect / Magnitude
- Only source-extracted comparisons retained; no pooled benefit estimate.
- Evidence Summary
- CGM excursions decreased without measurable fitness or body-composition change.
- Limitations
- No parallel control; do not infer brain energy stability.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [2]
Connected / Supportive Evidence:
- Zametkin et al. (1990) [3]Why relevant: Preserved attached corpus, assessed for the mission-specific endpoint rather than inherited as an admission.Why excluded from the primary synthesis: The attached source is contextual. No separately extracted mission-specific intermediary or intervention endpoint justifies a new requirement, KC admission or phenome rating from this source.
- Di Girolamo et al. (2022) [4]Why relevant: Preserved attached corpus, assessed for the mission-specific endpoint rather than inherited as an admission.Why excluded from the primary synthesis: The attached source is contextual. No separately extracted mission-specific intermediary or intervention endpoint justifies a new requirement, KC admission or phenome rating from this source.
Mechanistic explanation: Short training and observed glucose excursions
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Fish before rice reduced within-meal glucose variability in the diabetes group.
What this means
This tests the excursion pattern, while PM1 considers its upstream emptying link.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F2
Finding Statement: Fish before rice reduced within-meal glucose variability in the diabetes group.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: This tests the excursion pattern, while PM1 considers its upstream emptying link.
Synthesis Limitations: Acute sequence-specific effects do not establish day-long stability.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Fish/rice crossover in twelve adults with type 2 diabetes and ten healthy volunteers.
- Population
- Fish/rice crossover in twelve adults with type 2 diabetes and ten healthy volunteers.
- Result
- Glucose standard deviation was lower with fish first in the diabetes group.
- Effect / Magnitude
- Only source-extracted comparisons retained; no pooled benefit estimate.
- Evidence Summary
- Glucose standard deviation was lower with fish first in the diabetes group.
- Limitations
- The healthy comparison and long-term response must not be assumed equivalent.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [5]
Mechanistic explanation: A meal protocol affects acute glucose variability
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
An observational diabetes study linked glucose fluctuation measures with urinary oxidative-stress markers.
What this means
The association motivates assessment; it does not demonstrate that flattening glucose improves cognition.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F3
Finding Statement: An observational diabetes study linked glucose fluctuation measures with urinary oxidative-stress markers.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: The original cohort association was not reproduced in an independent better-controlled diabetes sample using mass spectrometry. Population and assay differences constrain generalisation; this is not a causal oxidative-stress claim.
Synthesis Limitations: Independent null evidence prevents presenting the association as uniformly established across type 2 diabetes. Assay and glycaemic-control differences may contribute to heterogeneity; neither causal direction nor dietary/cognitive efficacy follows.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Observational type 2 diabetes CGM and urinary isoprostane comparison.
- Population
- Observational type 2 diabetes CGM and urinary isoprostane comparison.
- Result
- Greater excursions correlated with oxidative-stress marker excretion.
- Effect / Magnitude
- Only source-extracted comparisons retained; no pooled benefit estimate.
- Evidence Summary
- Greater excursions correlated with oxidative-stress marker excretion.
- Limitations
- Do not label this an induced-glucose-fluctuation experiment; inherited key has a wrong PMID.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [1]
Mechanistic explanation: Variability and oxidative stress are associated
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Brief walking interruptions reduced postprandial glucose and insulin exposure versus continuous sitting.
What this means
This supports activity-related meal responsiveness; AUC alone does not measure volatility.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F4
Finding Statement: Brief walking interruptions reduced postprandial glucose and insulin exposure versus continuous sitting.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: This supports activity-related meal responsiveness; AUC alone does not measure volatility.
Synthesis Limitations: Nineteen overweight/obese adults, acute laboratory comparison; no synthesis/disposal tracer.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Randomized crossover, two-minute walking breaks every twenty minutes versus uninterrupted sitting.
- Population
- Randomized crossover, two-minute walking breaks every twenty minutes versus uninterrupted sitting.
- Result
- Post-meal glucose and insulin AUC were lower.
- Effect / Magnitude
- Only source-extracted comparisons retained; no pooled benefit estimate.
- Evidence Summary
- Post-meal glucose and insulin AUC were lower.
- Limitations
- Do not substitute average exposure for CGM variability or insulin sensitivity.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [6]
Mechanistic explanation: Sitting breaks lower a meal response without proving a volatility endpoint
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Supports SOP: Less-processed whole-grain food package (two-week trial)
In adults with type 2 diabetes, the tested less-processed whole-grain package reduced daily glucose standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) versus a nutrient-matched finely processed package over two weeks.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F5
Finding Statement: In adults with type 2 diabetes, the tested less-processed whole-grain package reduced daily glucose standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) versus a nutrient-matched finely processed package over two weeks.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: Daily glucose SD difference -0.16 mmol/L (95% CI -0.25 to -0.06); mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) -0.36 (-0.65 to -0.08). Time in range and CONGA were null. A food package, not an isolated grain or fibre effect; unmasked foods, short duration. Concealed randomisation, blinded CGM, initial masked analysis and intention-to-treat models support appraisal.
Synthesis Limitations: A food package, not an isolated grain or fibre effect; unmasked foods, short duration. Concealed randomisation, blinded CGM, initial masked analysis and intention-to-treat models support appraisal.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Two-week crossover: intact oats, brown rice and coarse/kibbled bread versus matched finely processed whole-grain products; at least two-week washout.
- Population
- 31 adults with type 2 diabetes; 28 completed.
- Result
- Daily glucose SD difference -0.16 mmol/L (95% CI -0.25 to -0.06); mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) -0.36 (-0.65 to -0.08). Time in range and CONGA were null.
- Effect / Magnitude
- Daily glucose SD difference -0.16 mmol/L (95% CI -0.25 to -0.06); mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) -0.36 (-0.65 to -0.08). Time in range and CONGA were null.
- Evidence Summary
- Daily glucose SD difference -0.16 mmol/L (95% CI -0.25 to -0.06); mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) -0.36 (-0.65 to -0.08). Time in range and CONGA were null. A food package, not an isolated grain or fibre effect; unmasked foods, short duration. Concealed randomisation, blinded CGM, initial masked analysis and intention-to-treat models support appraisal.
- Limitations
- A food package, not an isolated grain or fibre effect; unmasked foods, short duration. Concealed randomisation, blinded CGM, initial masked analysis and intention-to-treat models support appraisal.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [7]
Mechanistic explanation: Whole-grain processing and daily variability
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Supports SOP: Early eating with front-loaded calories (six-day trial)
In a small prediabetes crossover, the tested early, front-loaded eating schedule reduced mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) over six days versus later calorie distribution; mean glucose and several other variability/range measures were inconclusive.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F6
Finding Statement: In a small prediabetes crossover, the tested early, front-loaded eating schedule reduced mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) over six days versus later calorie distribution; mean glucose and several other variability/range measures were inconclusive.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: MAGE 2.4 versus 2.9 mmol/L (p=0.001); mean glucose, SD and time 70-180 mg/dL were not significantly different. Small sample, no washout; timing, eating-window length and calorie distribution cannot be separated.
Synthesis Limitations: Small sample, no washout; timing, eating-window length and calorie distribution cannot be separated.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Six days of matched weight-maintenance food: 08:00-16:00, 80% of calories before 14:00, versus usual later distribution; randomised crossover without washout.
- Population
- 10 adults with prediabetes and overweight/obesity.
- Result
- MAGE 2.4 versus 2.9 mmol/L (p=0.001); mean glucose, SD and time 70-180 mg/dL were not significantly different.
- Effect / Magnitude
- MAGE 2.4 versus 2.9 mmol/L (p=0.001); mean glucose, SD and time 70-180 mg/dL were not significantly different.
- Evidence Summary
- MAGE 2.4 versus 2.9 mmol/L (p=0.001); mean glucose, SD and time 70-180 mg/dL were not significantly different. Small sample, no washout; timing, eating-window length and calorie distribution cannot be separated.
- Limitations
- Small sample, no washout; timing, eating-window length and calorie distribution cannot be separated.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [8]
Mechanistic explanation: Early eating and glucose variability
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Supports Lifestyle Lever: Supervised interval walking (two-week trial)
Two weeks of the tested supervised interval-walking programme reduced mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) versus an inactive control period in a small type 2 diabetes crossover trial.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F7
Finding Statement: Two weeks of the tested supervised interval-walking programme reduced mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) versus an inactive control period in a small type 2 diabetes crossover trial.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: MAGE decreased 1.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/L within interval training; interval/control comparison p=0.01. Within-period mean glucose was inconclusive (p=0.08). Small unmasked trial, baseline imbalance and missing sensor record; oxidative-stress markers did not improve. No blanket superiority to all continuous exercise.
Synthesis Limitations: Small unmasked trial, baseline imbalance and missing sensor record; oxidative-stress markers did not improve. No blanket superiority to all continuous exercise.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Randomised crossover: ten supervised 60-minute sessions over two weeks, alternating three-minute slower/faster walking; continuous and inactive comparator periods, multiweek washout.
- Population
- 14 adults with type 2 diabetes; 13 usable CGM records.
- Result
- MAGE decreased 1.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/L within interval training; interval/control comparison p=0.01. Within-period mean glucose was inconclusive (p=0.08).
- Effect / Magnitude
- MAGE decreased 1.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/L within interval training; interval/control comparison p=0.01. Within-period mean glucose was inconclusive (p=0.08).
- Evidence Summary
- MAGE decreased 1.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/L within interval training; interval/control comparison p=0.01. Within-period mean glucose was inconclusive (p=0.08). Small unmasked trial, baseline imbalance and missing sensor record; oxidative-stress markers did not improve. No blanket superiority to all continuous exercise.
- Limitations
- Small unmasked trial, baseline imbalance and missing sensor record; oxidative-stress markers did not improve. No blanket superiority to all continuous exercise.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [10]
Mechanistic explanation: Interval walking and glucose variability
· Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Supports Lifestyle Lever: Four brief vigorous activity bouts daily (48-hour trial)
Four brief vigorous bodyweight bouts daily produced small secondary continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) variability improvements over 48 hours in inactive adults with well-controlled type 2 diabetes; the primary mean-glucose contrast was not significant.
Evidence confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Finding ID: PM2-F8
Finding Statement: Four brief vigorous bodyweight bouts daily produced small secondary continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) variability improvements over 48 hours in inactive adults with well-controlled type 2 diabetes; the primary mean-glucose contrast was not significant.
Synthesised Evidence Confidence: · Provisionally assessed · Evidence & Audit
Synthesis: Primary mean difference -0.2 mmol/L (95% CI -0.4 to 0; p=0.07). Secondary SD -0.1 mmol/L, CV -1 percentage point and MAGE -0.3 mmol/L; time in range was null. Small secondary effects without multiplicity adjustment; short washout permits carryover. Not evidence for gentle walking or lasting clinical benefit.
Synthesis Limitations: Small secondary effects without multiplicity adjustment; short washout permits carryover. Not evidence for gentle walking or lasting clinical benefit.
Evidence Considered:
- Study
- Two 48-hour crossover periods: four one-minute vigorous bodyweight bouts daily versus usual activity; at least one hour between bouts, encouraged after meals.
- Population
- 31 inactive adults with well-controlled, non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.
- Result
- Primary mean difference -0.2 mmol/L (95% CI -0.4 to 0; p=0.07). Secondary SD -0.1 mmol/L, CV -1 percentage point and MAGE -0.3 mmol/L; time in range was null.
- Effect / Magnitude
- Primary mean difference -0.2 mmol/L (95% CI -0.4 to 0; p=0.07). Secondary SD -0.1 mmol/L, CV -1 percentage point and MAGE -0.3 mmol/L; time in range was null.
- Evidence Summary
- Primary mean difference -0.2 mmol/L (95% CI -0.4 to 0; p=0.07). Secondary SD -0.1 mmol/L, CV -1 percentage point and MAGE -0.3 mmol/L; time in range was null. Small secondary effects without multiplicity adjustment; short washout permits carryover. Not evidence for gentle walking or lasting clinical benefit.
- Limitations
- Small secondary effects without multiplicity adjustment; short washout permits carryover. Not evidence for gentle walking or lasting clinical benefit.
- Evidence Source
- Bounded external search
- Reference
- [11]
Mechanistic explanation: Vigorous activity bouts and variability
5. BRS Pathways and Connections
5.1 BRS Pathways
No newly adjudicated BRS pathway is established by this assessment.
5.2 Cross-BRS Mechanism Relationships
No downstream mapping is inherited from a shared nutrient or KC candidate.
5.3 Local BRS Mechanism Relationships
PM1 addresses entry and PM3 addresses disposal; variability is their observed profile, not either flux measurement.
7. Phenome Connections
These mappings are translational relationships, not single-mechanism outcome claims. Phenomes are emergent functional patterns supported by multiple interacting PMs across the BRAIN Framework.
Each Phenome relationship has two independent ratings. They are not combined or averaged.
Biology → Phenome Relationship Strength
How direct and important is this biological mechanism expected to be to the Phenome within the BRAIN model?
Evidence Confidence
How strongly does the adjudicated evidence support this particular biology → Phenome relationship?
No direct functional outcome relationship currently mapped.
8. References
- [1] Monnier et al. (2006) — Activation of Oxidative Stress by Acute Glucose Fluctuations Compared with Sustained Chronic
- [2] Mikus et al. (2012) — Glycaemic Control Is Improved by 7 Days of Aerobic Exercise Training in
- [3] Zametkin et al. (1990) — Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Adults with Hyperactivity of Childhood Onset
- [4] Di Girolamo et al. (2022) — Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance in a Sample of Adult
- [5] Kuwata et al. (2016) — Meal sequence and glucose excursion, gastric emptying and incretin secretion in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, controlled crossover, exploratory trial
- [6] Dunstan et al. (2012) — Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses
- [7] Aberg et al. (2020)
- [8] Bruno et al. (2024)
- [9] Jamshed et al. (2019)
- [10] Karstoft et al. (2017)
- [11] Babir et al. (2026)
- [12] Trico et al. (2016)
- [13] Shukla et al. (2017)
- [14] Touhamy et al. (2025)
- [15] Smith et al. (2022)
- [16] Pabla et al. (2025)
- [17] Collins et al. (2025)
- [18] Sonia et al. (2015)
- [19] Liatis et al. (2010)
- [20] Reynolds et al. (2016)
- [21] Dempsey et al. (2017)
- [22] Bailey et al. (2022)
- [23] Resistance/endurance comparison (2012)
- [24] Wheat-porridge comparison (2022)
PM-local source records
Aberg et al. (2020). Whole-Grain Processing and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes. 10.2337/dc20-0263. Full primary Methods/Results
Bruno et al. (2024). Weight-neutral early time-restricted eating improves glycemic variation and time in range without changes in inflammatory markers. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111501. Full primary Methods/Results
Jamshed et al. (2019). Early Time-Restricted Feeding Improves 24-Hour Glucose Levels and Affects Markers of the Circadian Clock, Aging, and Autophagy in Humans. 10.3390/nu11061234. Full primary Methods/Results
Karstoft et al. (2017). The effects of 2 weeks of interval vs continuous walking training on glycaemic control and whole-body oxidative stress in individuals with type 2 diabetes. 10.1007/s00125-016-4170-6. Full publisher PDF Methods, Table 1 and Results
Babir et al. (2026). Exercise snacks performed in real-world settings reduce postprandial hyperglycaemia and glycaemic variability in individuals living with type 2 diabetes. 10.1007/s00125-026-06741-2. Full primary Methods/Results
Trico et al. (2016). Manipulating the sequence of food ingestion improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients under free-living conditions. 10.1038/nutd.2016.33. Full primary Methods/Results
Shukla et al. (2017). Carbohydrate-last meal pattern lowers postprandial glucose and insulin excursions in type 2 diabetes. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000440. Abstract; full methods not recovered in this assessment
Touhamy et al. (2025). Meal-sequence CGM report (PMID 39688621). 10.2337/dc24-1956. Publisher PDF denied access; PMC verification barrier; Europe PMC recovery did not yield full methods
Smith et al. (2022). Premeal whey protein and free-living glycaemia. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-002820. Full primary Methods/Results
Pabla et al. (2025). Medium-chain triglyceride and whey preload crossover trial. 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.022. Full primary Methods/Results
Collins et al. (2025). Resistant-starch substitution and continuous glucose outcomes. 10.1111/dme.70079. Full primary Methods/Results
Sonia et al. (2015). Cooling cooked white rice and postprandial glycaemic response. 10.6133/apjcn.2015.24.4.13. Primary abstract; full methods not appraised
Liatis et al. (2010). Vinegar reduces postprandial hyperglycaemia in patients with type II diabetes when added to a high, but not to a low, glycaemic index meal. 10.1038/ejcn.2010.89. Primary abstract and limited full-text inspection; methods not fully appraised
Reynolds et al. (2016). Advice to walk after meals is more effective for lowering postprandial glycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus than advice that does not specify timing. 10.1007/s00125-016-4085-2. Full publisher PDF Methods/Results
Dempsey et al. (2017). Interrupting prolonged sitting and subsequent glucose regulation in type 2 diabetes. 10.1007/s00125-016-4169-z. Publisher abstract; full quantitative variability appraisal unavailable
Bailey et al. (2022). Free-living sitting-reduction crossover and glucose outcomes. 10.3390/nu14030605. Full primary Methods/Results
Resistance/endurance comparison (2012). Acute resistance and endurance exercise in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. 10.1139/apnm-2012-0494. Primary abstract only
Wheat-porridge comparison (2022). Whole-grain and refined wheat porridge comparison. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab434. Primary abstract only
No validated structured conversion route is currently projected for this PM. This does not remove or reclassify its existing dietary inputs.
Mapping state: canonical-record-review-required.